Hi guys,
wow, its been forever since i posted in xanga! well since this summer anyways. ok so this blog is in two parts, one is an update and two is a little bit of a rant (certain people are very frustrating to deal with right now. no worries, i'm not talking about you).
UPDATES!
so for those of you who don't know, last year i ended the semester early and took a leave of absence from Ripon. I love all, ok a vast majority, of the people that i've met there, but this last year an a half has been an incredibly long, hard, painful one full of self doubt, self hate and self discovery. i made a great many mistakes along the way, fell down alot, bled alot (metaphorically) and ended up deciding that: i couldn't stay some place where the only thing keeping me there was people. as much as i love my sisters, and i do love them more then i can say. as much as i love Mari, Jarred, Jeff, Ashley, Lucas, and every one else, i couldn't stay some where that i was miserable. so after much debate, counseling, and talk with my dad i ended the spring semester early and took a leave of absence for the fall. in the mean time i began the fruitless search for a job, and started surveying my options. Culinary school quickly rose to the top of my list of things i wanted to do with my life. a list which, by the way, is very long and still on going. i continued the counseling that i began in Ripon with Kris, a truly wonderful woman who works out of Eagle WI, and continued on the medication my psychiatrist prescribed for my panic attacks. finally after almost giving up hope that mom would agree to let me go to culinary school in the fall instead of Ripon, i received a call from an admin rep at Le Cordon Blue (which amazingly enough had not been on my list of schools). Cady had called and requested information in my name, the little meddler. but within a week i had not only forgiven her, but was enrolled in the next available term. so now i am currently a student here at LCB in the 15 month Baking and Patisserie program. i couldn't be happier!
moving on to part two.
RANTS!
i will admit, i may be being slightly hypocritical because im sure i have done this before but: it really bothers me when people don't understand something, whether a concept or situation, but think that not only do they understand it, they're experts in the field.
my room mate is like that. she just turned twenty in early oct. has never had any post high school education and currently attends Brown College which is LCB's sister school. she has planned a degree in criminal justus with an emphasis in social work, but is far more concerned with going out every night then studying or even buying her books. she doesn't try to educate herself outside of the class room and rarely attends classes, even though she only has three days of class per week. then like tonight she presents me with random tidbits that she's read in some article. to nights was "did you know in the 19th century, you weren't aloud to through snow balls, isn't that just crazy"?
so i tried explaining what i knew of the time period to her, so that she could better understand why people weren't aloud to through snow balls. the whole protestant reformation in that general era could have accounted for the lack of snowy warfare. her rebuttal: "thats just stupid man, talk about bullshit. people are such dumb asses, why didn't anyone do anything about it?"
so i tried explaining that well by that time, it was just normal. you didn't throw snowballs, that was that, no one really thought about it. so then she decides that the normalcy of not throwing snow balls was comparable to murderers finding it normal to murder people.
since there are several different classifications of murder, and what makes someone a murderer, i had to disagree with her. she had previously tried to explain to me that a sociopath and a psychopath can eventually reach a point of moral compunction (she has never taken a psychology class criminal or otherwise).
so i gave her the comparison of the protestant reformation being similar to the middle class family of a third world country. they both have the basics they need to survive, food, water, shelter, minimal income but some income. and while the third world country family might dream of a better life or want more then what they have, they are to busy simply trying to live then about how to get the 80inch plasma screen TV that wouldn't work anyway because they don't have reliable electricity. like wise the typical protestant family might want more then they actually have, but because they have lived so long with things they way they were, they ended up being more concerned about feeding themselves in the winter then about being able to throw the occasional icy cold projectile. Maybe it wasn't the best analogy in the world but it worked better then the one she presented.
well her response was: "thats just stupid, no body should have to live like that."
she's right nobody should have to live like that, with out laughter or electricity, but when that is what you know, when that is your normal everyday life, how would you know the difference? in todays information age, yes its a little bit different, you have a more idealistic version of life presented to you in pictures and photos, tv commercials and news shows. but if you aren't privy to that source of information, how would you know? and why would you care when you have to take care of your family before you can even think of moving them, or finding a better life.
basically what gets to me is that she lives in an incredibly idealistic world and doesn't even try to understand the information that comes at her, or seek out information to back up her half cocked ideas of what's happening. she doesn't want to know the basics of what she talking about, but she still wants to talk, forming conclusions out of snippets of mangled and degraded information and calling it correct. then having these radical thoughts that completely screw with your perception of her thought processes.
for instance: her pervious statements have shown her to be libertarian leaning towards conservatism in certain aspects. but the other day she tried telling me that the only way to handle the rising birth rates in third world countries was to "fix" the women there. that it was the women's fault for the over populations and if they would just keep their legs closed then there wouldn't be so may mouths to feed and the countries wouldn't be so third world. she didn't take into account that one: no third world country could afford all of those procedures, two: it would decimate the population and eventually destroy it completely, and three: third world countries almost by definition suffer extreme corruption, which breeds crime. rape being only one of those crimes. ie. a lot of the women having children didn't ask to become pregnant, they didn't whore themselves out, or just keep popping out kids for fun, they were raped, turned in to breeding chattel or sold as sexual slaves to those who could afford it.
ignorance drives me nuts!
sorry for the long rant.
Sarah
Chatboard (0)